GAICC AI Conference & Awards 2026 "Governing the Future – Building Responsible, Safe and Human-centric AI"
The ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the first international standard for artificial intelligence management systems. It lists out the specifications needed to set up, practice, maintain, and continuously enhance an organization’s AI management system (AIMS). Essentially, ISO/IEC 42001 directs organizations that create or employ AI to handle the hazards and ethics of AI systems methodically.
It also helps tackle AI’s particular issues like ethical considerations, transparency, and continuous learning, by outlining rules for data quality, bias reduction, human oversight, and governance. The bottom line is that ISO/IEC 42001:2023 balances innovation with strong risk management to help businesses use AI safely.
The ISO/IEC 42001 standard was officially adopted as AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023 in Australia. The AI management system standard for usage in Australia was released by Standards Australia in February 2024. As a result, Australian businesses can now apply for certification to a national standard that is on par with the global ISO version.
The AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023 outlines the prerequisites for AI governance, including leadership, policy, risk assessment, and human oversight. By adhering to AS ISO/IEC 42001, Australian companies are able to engage with international best practices for AI. This further helps foster clarity and trust about AI use, data handling, impact assessment, and continuous development.
A Lead Implementer is basically an expert in creating and implementing an AI management system. They are responsible for creating AI policy, evaluating risks, and making sure AI initiatives adhere to ethical standards and the ISO 42001 framework. Collaboration across teams also takes place to include ethical AI practices.
When you become a Lead Implementer, you establish yourself as a reliable expert. This makes you an essential part of companies that view such certified experts as essential for helping adopt AI responsibly, ethically, and in line with global standards.
With AI’s explosive expansion, skilled implementers help satisfy stakeholder and regulatory requirements, reduce bias or security concerns, and establish confidence. At the end of the day, companies are looking for ISO 42001 Lead Implementers as they work to safely use AI and achieve a competitive edge.
If you’re planning to take the next step toward becoming a certified professional, our detailed GAICC ISO/IEC 42001 Certification Exam Guide walks you through the eligibility, syllabus, and exam process in simple terms.
Both positions use ISO 42001; however, they do have different goals. A Lead Implementer is in charge of designing and managing the AI management system, which includes defining controls, training teams, implementing AI governance frameworks, and ensuring AI policies are adhered to.
A Lead Auditor, on the other hand, plans and oversees audits to confirm that the AI management system complies with ISO 42001 criteria to help assess and certify the system. Basically, auditors provide independent reviews of the AI system while implementers create and oversee it within.
The Australian AI governance sector is growing, leading to increased demand for certified ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementers. Potential roles include:
Industry sectors hiring include:
Here is a little more detail on the career opportunities that open up to you as an ISO 42001 Lead Implementer in Australia:
AI Governance Manager:
An organization’s AI strategy and policies are overseen by the AI Governance Manager. This position creates risk controls, ethical standards, and governance frameworks to ensure that AI systems are used responsibly and transparently.
AI Risk and Compliance Consultant:
They offer businesses guidance on regulatory compliance and risk associated with AI and analyze AI systems, find weaknesses in existing procedures, and suggest solutions that are in line with ISO 42001.
They also collaborate with several clients to put measures in place for model safety, algorithmic bias, and data privacy, helping businesses navigate changing AI regulations and become ready for certification.
AI Ethics Officer:
Helps AI initiatives adhere to moral principles like fairness, accountability, and transparency, and helps put procedures in place to identify and reduce bias, verify model integrity, and record AI judgments.
They also collaborate with data science and legal teams using ISO 42001 training to incorporate values-driven practices into AI development to help maintain public trust by proactively addressing ethical concerns.
Internal Auditor:
An organization’s AI management system is audited internally by an internal auditor to examine AI governance in particular and expand on conventional auditing expertise. After reviewing AI policy, risk assessments, and control efficacy, they provide their findings to the leadership.
Internal auditors assist in maintaining continuous adherence to ISO 42001 and other standards and combine AI audits with current risk or IT audits.
Here’s a look at the average salary ranges for professionals in Australia who pursue careers related to GAICC ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer Certification:
| Role | Average Salary | Salary Range | Typical Experience Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Governance Manager | US$105,000 | US$92,000 – US$125,000 | Senior (8–12 years) |
| AI Risk & Compliance Consultant | US$88,000 | US$72,000 – US$105,000 | Mid–Senior (5–10 years) |
| Responsible AI Officer | US$95,000 | US$78,000 – US$115,000 | Mid–Senior (6–10 years) |
| Internal Auditor (AI/ISO 42001 focused) | US$78,000 | US$62,500 – US$92,000 | Mid-Level (4–8 years) |
For detailed salary insights, including average pay, top-paying roles, and global comparisons, visit our ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer Salary Guide.
While it differs from other management systems and laws, here’s how ISO/IEC 42001 differs from other standards:
ISO 42001 against ISO 27001:
Information security is governed by ISO 27001, which protects data availability, confidentiality, and integrity. Compared to this, ISO 42001 focuses on the ethics and governance of AI. Beyond the security focus of 27001, it also incorporates AI-specific controls like data governance, model explainability, bias prevention, etc.
Although ISO 42001 adds new standards specific to AI management, firms having ISO 27001 systems can reuse some risk assessment and audit procedures for ISO 42001. The bottom line is that while 42001 guarantees the safe, equitable, and moral operation of AI systems, 27001 protects against broad cybersecurity risks.
If you’d like a deeper breakdown of similarities, differences, and certification pathways between these standards, explore our detailed post on ISO/IEC 42001 vs ISO/IEC 27001
ISO 9001 vs. ISO 42001:
ISO 9001 is a general quality management standard that applies to all goods and services. Its main emphasis is on the ongoing process improvement and customer satisfaction. ISO 42001, on the other hand, only addresses AI and necessitates governance procedures like responsibility and oversight for AI projects, not included in ISO 9001, as well as risk and impact assessments unique to AI.
Both the standards require management-system thinking, but 42001 focuses on the moral, open, and secure application of AI in those processes, while 9001 is more centered around the effectiveness and quality of deliverables.
ISO 42001 vs. EU AI Act:
The EU AI Act was enacted in 2021. It is a legal rule that places regulatory requirements on some AI systems in the EU, particularly “high-risk” AI. In comparison, ISO 42001, which is an Australian Standard, is a voluntary, certifiable standard.
ISO 42001 addresses many of the same topics as the EU Act, like risk assessment, third-party audits, transparency, documentation, and governance structures. However, adherence to ISO 42001 does not automatically fulfill the law. Basically, Australian and international organizations can use ISO 42001 as a useful foundation to establish or comply with upcoming laws such as the EU Act.
NIST AI RMF vs. ISO 42001:
NIST created the U.S. NIST AI Risk Management Framework, which is a set of guidelines for handling AI hazards. It focuses on ongoing risk assessment throughout the AI lifecycle and is adaptable and U.S.-centric. Compared to that, the ISO 42001 is a systematic, certifiable worldwide management standard.
Both the standards strive toward reliable AI, although ISO 42001 emphasizes more on creating a formal governance system, while NIST stresses continuous risk assessment. Companies may choose one or both frameworks, as one offers an externally auditable certification, while the other guides without formal certification.
Expertise in AI governance is in greater demand. According to a recent PwC report, the number of Australian job ads requiring AI capabilities increased from over 2,000 in 2012 to over 23,000 by 2024, indicating a high level of AI adoption. Industries like financial services, insurance, and ICT continue to drive the need for AI skills.
Large Australian companies are already adopting AI guidelines in response, and KPMG Australia was the first company in the world to obtain ISO 42001 certification.
Similarly, Australian regulators and standards bodies are promoting the adoption of ISO 42001. All of these points towards the fact that over the next few years, Australian employers, whether it is big corporations or tech startups, will increasingly value professionals with ISO/IEC 42001 training.
Australian professionals can take advantage of specialist ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer self-paced training and certification programs offered by the Global AI Certification Council (GAICC). The entire AI management lifecycle is covered in GAICC’s training, which teaches participants how to create governance frameworks, evaluate ISO 42001 regulations, and perform AI risk assessments.
GAICC also educates candidates on how to deploy AI Management Systems and pass the GAICC Lead Implementer certification through self-paced learning modules, practical case studies, practice examinations, and offers study materials.
Basically, you can demonstrate your capacity to lead AI governance projects by enrolling in GAICC’s ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementer self-paced course, which equips you with the necessary skills and a formal credential.
Absolutely, as the Australian Standard AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Standards Australia has accepted ISO/IEC 42001:2023. This helps enterprises obtain ISO 42001 certification through the Australian accreditation system, and the international standard is now officially recognized in Australia.
Some of the industries in Australia hiring ISO 42001 professionals include the government, financial services, insurance, healthcare, and telecommunications industries.
Currently, ISO 42001 certification is not typically a strict requirement in job postings. The standard is new and voluntary, not a legal mandate.
As the first international standard for controlling AI systems, ISO/IEC 42001 is truly a turning point in AI governance. When you become an ISO 42001 Lead Implementer, it rapidly opens up your career path at the cutting edge of ethics and technology. The need for qualified AI governance specialists is growing since Standards Australia adopted the standard as AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023, and large companies like KPMG have already obtained certification.
GAICC’s ISO/IEC 42001 training provides a direct pathway: it equips you to implement AI management systems and validates your skills to employers. As AI continues to transform Australian industries, certified ISO 42001 professionals will play an essential role in ensuring these technologies are safe, ethical, and trusted.
A globally certified instructor in ISO/IEC, PMI®, TOGAF®, SAFe®, and Scrum.org disciplines. With over three years’ hands-on experience in ISO/IEC 42001 AI governance, he delivers training and consulting across New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and the UAE, combining high-end credentials with practical, real-world expertise and global reach.
